Map of independent air quality sensors
Latest updates

Web3 public sensors map

Welcome to the decentralized opensource sensors map which operates with the sole intent of serving the free will of individuals , without any beneficiaries. It offers two distinct layers of decentralization at your choise: peer-to-peer connectivity for direct access to sensor data, and the federative concept for accumulating sensor data and displaying measurement history. Click here for further technical details.

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors

airalab/sensors.social v4.0.3

Secured by

Your bookmarked sensors

Save any sensor from the map here for quicker access

Construction Site Monitoring: Data Instead of Complaints

Open sensor network for dust and noise control near construction sites. Continuous monitoring with open-source Altruist sensors, public data map, and citizen engagement.

Problem

Air pollution is a health threat. Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) causes ~200,000 premature deaths per year in Europe (EEA, 2025).

Construction is one of the largest local sources. Up to 30% of urban coarse particulate (PM10) emissions in London (London Atmospheric Emissions Inventory, 2019).

EU is tightening limits by 2030. Directive 2024/2881: PM10 drops from 40 to 20 µg/m³ (annual), PM2.5 from 25 to 10 µg/m³. All EU member states, including Cyprus, are required to implement the new standards.

Municipalities lack real-time data. Control is episodic — measurements once or twice a month. Resident complaints are subjective and contain no measurements. Construction companies are not incentivized to reduce impact.

Global Practices: Why Cities Switched to Continuous Monitoring

London — a construction boom overwhelmed councils with resident complaints. Solution: mandatory PM10 sensors at site boundaries, real-time data publicly accessible. Result: at 190 µg/m³ dusty works stop automatically — no inspector needed.

Singapore — dense urban fabric, construction noise unbearable in residential blocks. Developers required to monitor noise at their own expense. Fines up to SGD 50,000. Result: developers started managing noise themselves because it is cheaper than fines.

Seoul — citizens demanded air quality data. The city deployed tens of thousands of IoT sensors (S-DoT) — an open platform with public access. Result: decisions based on facts, not subjective assessments.

Hong Kong — construction incidents + air pollution triggered public pressure. 4S system mandatory since 2023: sensors, auto-alerts, auto-reports to the regulator.

Stuttgart / sensors.community (Luftdaten) — citizens frustrated by PM10 exceedances built their own sensor network. Started in 2015 with a handful of DIY sensors (ESP8266 + SDS011, ~EUR 30 each). Grew to tens of thousands of sensors in 70+ countries — the largest citizen air quality network in the world. Result: citizen-generated data pressured the city into driving bans and infrastructure changes.

Common thread: in every case, citizen complaints were the trigger, and objective public data was the solution. The Luftdaten project proved that a bottom-up citizen network can scale faster and cheaper than any top-down B2B deployment.

KPI for Construction Companies

ZonePM10 (24h)PM10 (1h peak)Daytime noiseNighttime noise
Green< 45 µg/m³< 150 µg/m³< 70 dB< 50 dB
Yellow45–80 µg/m³150–190 µg/m³70–75 dB50–55 dB
Red> 80 µg/m³> 190 µg/m³> 75 dB> 55 dB

Green zone — bonuses: expedited permits, density bonus 3–5%, reduced fees, environmental deposit refund.

Red zone — escalation: warning → fine → stop-work order.

Solution — Open Sensor Network

Open-source Altruist sensors:

  • PM2.5, PM10 (laser SDS011, periodic calibration against reference stations)
  • Noise (MEMS microphone ICS-43434)
  • Temperature, humidity, pressure (BME280)

Local operation without clouds. Data is stored on network nodes within the city — decentralized cryptographic verification. Historical data cannot be falsified retroactively.

Open software — full auditability. The municipality, developers, and residents can verify what is measured and how. No hidden algorithms.

~EUR 250 per sensor. Open-source design and our custom architecture make the sensor network a public good — something corporate solutions cannot offer.

Civic Sensor Network: How It Works

Municipality — organizer, citizens — the network. Our model follows the proven sensors.community (Luftdaten) approach — citizen engagement instead of B2B contracts with monitoring companies.

  1. The municipality knows where construction will take place next year.
  2. Announcement on the website + resident meetings: "10–20 sensors funded for homes around these construction sites."
  3. Residents from buildings near the site request a free sensor — via a code on the website or in person at the municipality.
  4. Mounting on a balcony or facade — the sensor connects to Wi-Fi and starts transmitting data.
  5. Data automatically appears on the public map.

The municipality keeps a stock of sensors and distributes on request, knowing the citizen's address — this ensures coverage precisely around the construction site.

Result: a monitoring network built by residents, at minimal municipal cost (~EUR 250 × 10–20 sensors). Data on a municipal server, open-source software.